http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/027/metro/Swamped_VA_hurt_by_its_own_successesP.shtml

THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING


The Boston Globe OnlineBoston.com
Boston Globe Online / City & Region

 

Swamped VA hurt by its own successes

Many still waiting for their initial visit

By Alice Dembner, Globe Staff, 1/27/2003

The patients surged in last year when Polaroid Corp. went bankrupt and canceled all health insurance for retirees. They trooped in when HMOs dropped their managed-care plans for seniors. And they've steadily marched in for bargain prices on prescription drugs and quality medical care.

Since Veterans Affairs hospitals and clinics threw open their doors to all veterans four years ago, nearly 3 million more have signed up for care, as the VA became a safety valve for the troubled American health-care system. But the army of patients is overwhelming what has become the nation's largest health-care provider.

The 70 percent growth nationwide, dwarfing a 24 percent budget increase, has forced hundreds of thousands of veterans to wait months for even the most basic care. And last week, the crunch led to a moratorium on enrollment for veterans without service-connected illnesses or poverty-level incomes, the very people targeted in the 1998 expansion.

''We've got this great reservoir of need out there, and we have very few systems that can accommodate that,'' said US Representative Stephen F. Lynch, a Boston Democrat who sits on the Veterans Affairs committee. ''The VA has done a remarkable job, but access has become a problem. And now, there's a retrenchment on our commitment to veterans.''

In New England, nearly 125,000 veterans have signed up for care since 1998, boosting the patient load by two-thirds. More than 14,000 people are waiting to see primary-care doctors for the initial visit that will allow them access to a full range of medical services. The wait in Massachusetts is worst in the Bedford area, where veterans advocate Bob Hogan says it can take a year to get care.

''Some of these guys and women, they need new medications now,'' said Hogan, director of veterans services for Burlington and Bedford. ''They're losing health insurance or their supplemental insurance doesn't cover stuff.

''If we can't take care of the veterans we have now and we're going to be creating a whole new generation of veterans, who's going to be taking care of them?''

George Curran, a 69-year-old Korean War veteran from Burlington, got to see a doctor last week - 11 months after applying for coverage.

Like many of the new enrollees, he plans to tap the VA mostly for prescription drugs because it is so much cheaper than his private insurance. For low-income veterans, prescribed drugs are free. Those with modest incomes, such as Curran, pay $7 per monthly dose.

''I was strictly after the pharmacy program because my medications run about $160 per month,'' said Curran, who has high blood pressure and heart problems. ''I have Harvard-Pilgrim Seniority but they don't cover medications very well. This is going to be a big help. But I think it's outrageous to have to wait this long for something all veterans were promised.''

Under the VA's triage system, patients with emergencies get immediate attention, but that can lengthen the wait for others. VA secretary Anthony J. Principi said in a statement that his goal in imposing a moratorium on enrollment was to ''maintain its focus on the health-care needs of its core group of veterans - those with service-connected disabilities, the indigent, and those with special health-care needs.''

He said he hoped it would reduce waiting time for veterans already enrolled.

Traditionally, the armed forces promised veterans that they would get free health care if they fit one of those core categories. But in 1996, Congress authorized an expansion - for modest copayments - to all veterans. The VA opened 400 outpatient clinics and began caring for the new group in 1998.

It quickly became a victim of its own success.

Nationwide, the VA is now treating 4.6 million veterans, and another 2.3 million have signed up for care but are not yet using it. About half the new enrollees are neither disabled nor low-income. More than 150,000 are lined up for their first appointments, while 80,000 longtime patients are waiting for follow-up care.

Waits are especially long in Florida and other states with large clusters of veterans older than 65.

''We got aggressive about enrolling veterans, we built more clinics, and we were just too successful at the same time HMOs were disbanding,'' said Gail Goza-MacMullan, a spokeswoman for the New England VA medical system.

Among the big draws is the quality of care. The VA is recognized as a leader in quality improvement and in reducing medical errors. Although many veterans complain about the waits, nearly all praise the care.

''While the quality is good, people came because it's very low-cost, particularly for drugs, relative to private-sector policies and Medicare,'' said Gail Wilensky, cochair of a task force set up by President Bush to help address the crisis.

Because of the volume of prescriptions, the VA is able to obtain discounts averaging as much as 50 percent below average wholesale prices. Despite the price breaks, overall VA spending on outpatient prescription drugs rose from $2 billion in 1999 to more than $3 billion last year, according to the General Accounting Office.

The overcrowding is starting to affect disabled veterans, in some cases delaying badly needed care. Richard Johnston, a 72-year-old Korean War veteran, waited hours last Friday at the urgent-care department at the VA's Brockton hospital to find out why his right arm hurt so much he could hardly use it. He had tried to get an office appointment with an orthopedist, but the earliest available was in May.

''This is the only source of medical care I have,'' said Johnston. ''I'm 100 percent disabled. I need to count on these people and it's not working out.''

Others have been discouraged from even applying for care because of the wait lists. State American Legion commander Jim Fratolillo sees the new moratorium as a ploy to minimize the demand, so that Congress and the administration face less pressure to find a solution.

The moratorium is expected to turn away 164,000 veterans this year alone. Yet, hundreds of thousands more are expected to enroll. In New England alone, enrollment is expected to jump more than 20 percent in the next decade.

Arlen Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican who chairs the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee, has announced plans to hold hearings on the moratorium and the wait lists.

Lynch has proposed allowing veterans to fill prescriptions through the VA without seeing VA doctors, a suggestion the VA has previously rejected.

Officials of the VA and Medicare are also discussing allowing veterans excluded from the VA under the moratorium to get treatment nonetheless under their Medicare benefits, which would bring in needed money.

Locally, the VA has been aggressively hiring doctors and trying to shift patients from overcrowded hospitals to clinics with more space, but in Bedford and Brockton so far, the demand has been too great.

A big boost in funding, allowing the addition of more medical staff, could help and President Bush has requested a 7.7 percent increase for 2004.

While supporting that boost, members of the Massachusetts congressional delegation, led by Lynch, this week asked Principi to rescind his moratorium, writing in their letter that the VA is treating veterans ''as impediments to fiscal soundness rather than patients who deserve the best possible care.''

Alice Dembner can be reached at dembner@globe.com.

This story ran on page A1 of the Boston Globe on 1/27/2003.
© Copyright 2003 Globe Newspaper Company.